Better Decisions Start With
Better Reasoning
Validity audits how conclusions are reached inside high-stakes documents—exposing hidden flaws before they become costly decisions.
Validity does not rewrite documents or assess tone. It evaluates the logical structure underlying conclusions.
Who It's For
Investment
Catch flawed theses before capital is committed
AI
Audit reasoning before trusting the output
Prediction Markets
Audit probability reasoning before the bet
Policy
Stress-test recommendations before consequences
Legal
Expose weak arguments before scrutiny
Strategy
Validate logic before clients do
What It Detects
Unsupported assumptions
Hidden premises that feel obvious but lack foundation
Logical leaps and causal gaps
Missing steps between evidence and conclusions
Overconfidence masked as certainty
Assertions that sound definitive but rest on weak support
Risk blindness and narrative-driven conclusions
When the story is too clean, critical threats disappear from view
Sample Output
Inferential Chain Breakdown
The conclusion depends on three sequential assumptions, each independently unverified. Failure of any single assumption invalidates the projection.
Unsupported Causality
Claims market maturity will drive adoption without establishing mechanism or precedent.
Selective Evidence
Quantitative support provided only for favorable scenarios. Downside risks mentioned but not quantified.